DACA Needs To Stay!

Image result for daca supporters
DACA! DACA! DACA!

As I come to the end of this, I have realized that I learned so much more than what I have already known about DACA. If you don’t recall I would like to welcome you to read my first post. There you will find a brief background and purpose as to why I decided to write about this program.

Image result for crying families in daca
We matter

Moving further and concluding my last post, I decide to use a short documentary titled “What Dreamers Gained From DACA, and Stand to Lose” in which explains the situation with these DACA recipients by interviewing young immigrants in the DACA program.  We can already tell from the title of  this documentary that these Dreamers will talk about they gained from this beneficiary program and what is at risk now that DACA ended. Many have taken little importance to this documentary but after watching it, I interrupted as an inspiring film that shows how beneficiary the DACA program is for students not to mention, eye opening for those who are against it because it diminishes false critiques. Furthermore, we should take the chance to put ourselves in these young Dreamers shoes and try to sympathize with them

The documentary helps us empathizes with DACA recipients because we get to know a little about them. They introduce themselves, state how old they were when they came to this country, how old they are in present day, how long they have lived in the United States and some say were they were born in.

Image result for diversity in daca
We are a diverse community

There has definitely been a misunderstanding that all of the dreamers are only from a certain area. When the documentary showed these young immigrants saying where they were born, I thought it was important because mostly everyone has that false misconception that they are all Mexican, which is not true at all. Bruna Bouhid for example, is one of the Dreamers from this video and she says she was brought to the U.S at the age of seven and was born in Brazil, a South American country. In a recent post, Eugene Scott stated that “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program is often centered on Latinos, and specifically Mexican immigrants. But the population that immigrated to the United States illegally as minors is much more diverse than that”. In fact, the uppermost countries in which these young immigrants come from are Asia, Europe, Caribbean and of course the Latin countries. Not to mention that, “Tens of thousands of young people from South Korea, the Philippines, India, Jamaica, Tobago, Poland and Pakistan arrived in the United States as minors and have been protected from the threat of deportation since DACA was established in 2012.” With that said, we can diminish that common critique and instead flourish this new sense that these young people are not all Mexicans.

Related image
Stop separating families

In another pattern, these young people and their families are mostly fearful now that the program ended. Many of them mention how afraid they are to be separated, to be deported to a country they are not familiar with. For instance, we have Bruna who says, “every time my parents call me after 11 pm my heart is racing”. What does this mean exactly? This means that for her to receive a call that late at night can most likely result in getting deported or her parents getting deported. That is a feeling no one ever should experience because it is horrible, I can sincerely say I have experienced something like that. My grandma once called me crying on the phone and I couldn’t think of anything else but the thought of my mom getting deported and I burst out into tears not knowing the real reason of the phone call.

Image result for crying families immigrants
Don’t deport

Another individual from the video, Angelica Villalobos , sadly explains how she has been adapting her children for the worst case scenario, “ I have been preparing my kids, you know these are the risks, this can happen to your dad or to me” This can be truly heart breaking, for a mother to tell her children there is a great possibility of not seeing them again.

Image result for angry  daca immigrants
Are here to stay

In another scene, many of these dreamers are extremely furious and feel betrayal. Reyna Montoya feels anger and resentment towards the government.  She expresses her emotions and says, “Can you imagine? The government made a promise to us: come forward, come out of the shadows and we’re going to promise you that you are not going to be in deportation proceedings.” These young people were hiding, they were on their best behavior, they have been living in fear since they got here. DACA came and diminished their fears, but now that it is gone their fears are back and they go back to their hiding places. Luis Angel Aguilar a dreamer for the documentary describes this situation as a “tug of war” he continues and says, “when you are undocumented you are always just aware of the situations, the locations, who you are talking to, how you are interacting with folks, ensuring that you don’t do anything that could bring attention to you because you live a life of shadows” Can you just envision yourself constantly being paranoid that someone might give you in or that you are stopped by a cop and asks for your legal documentation, or even just the way you talk to people might give a sense that you are undocumented? Like I mentioned before these young people live that daily not only them but other illegal immigrants who didn’t have the opportunity of getting into the program.

The reason I was drawn to this documentary was because I wanted to show and for my readers to get to know these dreamers for who they truly are and not for something someone who is against made up. It is important to know the truth because the program is ending for the wrong reasons. I have many family members and friends who were in this program and are now struggling with what to do next. My biggest take home form all of my post is just to simply be fully informed of this program and the Dreamers because we cannot just assume and critique something we have no clue about.

What Do I Think

 

Image result for yes to amnesty
Why Not?

 

As I continue the controversial issue on whether or not the U.S should grant citizenship to the young immigrants enrolled in the DACA program, I believe the privilege should be given. After considering both sides of the debate, I think the United States of America should give these Dreamers amnesty because in addition to the arguments proponents make that I explained in DACA Helps Our -Country, giving legal status will create law-abiding individuals lessening crime overall.

 

Image result for daca yes
Proud To Be A Dreamer

Undocumented immigrants were seriously in their best behavior especially after Trumps’ announcement on the deportation of those who have entered the country Illegally.  I am convinced that these immigrants came to this country for a better opportunity and a better life therefore bypass any trouble as much as possible. Delfin Polanco, an immigrant from the Dominican Republic who came to this country at a young age assures “I’ve never been to jail,” “Tickets, nothing”. I suppose that this man, along with many others have stayed away from problems because they want to prove to the U.S they deserve amnesty.

They are full of good morals and have remained respectful citizens since their arrival to America. Their attachment to this country continues to grow and the more they comply with the laws the more they become a citizen. Jesus Canseco an illegal immigrant who was recently deported and separated from his family states “ I felt myself as an American”. I can see why undocumented immigrants feel this way because they have been in this country for so long, they have paid taxes and even learned the language, how can they not feel as if it is a country of their own.

 

Image result for we are not criminals
We Are Not Criminals

Some studies have comparatively shown that immigrants are implausible to commit crimes. This study done between immigrants and American citizens has shown that only “1.6 percent of immigrants males are incarcerated” while “3.3 percent of the native born” are incarcerated. Not only that but illegal immigrants have decreased crime in the U.S all together. “FBI data indicated that the violent crime rate declined 48 percent”. I am intrigued by these investigations considering that some of us have wrongly accused innocent immigrants of being “criminals, drug dealers, rapist, etc.” Instead I think we should be appreciating their good participation in this country and giving them citizenship.

Although giving amnesty, as I mentioned in an earlier post, would benefit our economy because of the paid taxes these immigrants will pay, decreasing crime can also be as important. The world is already a dangerous place and if we can make it safer then our community would be grateful.  I want to be able to walk out of work without the fear of something bad happening and if giving amnesty to immigrants who actually help with the well-being of the country then we ought to give it to them.

Image result for we belong together protest
Unidos!

These young immigrants have worked so hard to get where they are and some are even working harder than actual citizens. Who are we to deprive them of their dreams. They have been productive members of society and deserve an equal opportunity. Lets give them amnesty!

Why Opponents Say NO

Image result for anti immigration
Anti-immigration

I am sure you can imagine the outraged that has come upon when the question: Should DACA recipients be given amnesty aroused. To reiterate, President Trump has recently rescind the DACA program leaving many in fear and disappointment and others satisfied. The word amnesty basically means that the government will pardon those who have entered the country illegally in this case would be as most like to call them, the dreamers. So the question still stands, should DACA recipients be granted amnesty?

In my previous post I talked about people who agreed upon the decision of giving amnesty to the DACA students. In this post I would like to talk about those who oppose. We can assume why there could be many reasons as to not agreeing however, opponents make their best argument for DACA students when they say that granting amnesty is a bad idea because it is unfair to American citizens.

Image result for no amnesty for dreamers
Path to citizenship

Opponents say giving citizenship to immigrants is undoubtfully a poor proposal because the law of the land says otherwise. An opponent claims in his article that “There is only one way to ensure that illegal immigrants go to the back of the line, and that the rule of law is respected” he wants the rule of law to be enforced and followed by dismissing all the illegal immigrants. He also states that giving amnesty is just skipping steps and is unfair to others who are really trying to get into this country legally. They broke a law and for that they do not deserve a pathway to citizenship. A professor from Brooklyn Law School said that there can be a negative aspect in regards of allowing amnesty “they can encourage people to break the law in the hope that they will eventually be forgiven rather than punished”. This basically means that these undocumented individuals will actually be rewarded for breaking the law by coming into the U.S illegally instead of being punished.

Image result for no amnesty
Is it really rewarding?

Granting amnesty can mostly be ineffective to the country because the idea of a pathway to citizenship will stimulate more people to come. An individual who is anti-immigration asserts in his article that giving amnesty would just create a “chain”. For example, “As soon as amnestied illegal immigrants become U.S. citizens, current law allows them to petition for their parents to also obtain lifetime work permits and permanent residency”. The chain does not stop there, once the parents become citizens they are able to grant anyone else, such as their siblings and parents. Having this chain go on and on can definitely lead to over population. According to another article giving amnesty to DACA recipients “would open the door for 1.4 million more of their parents and relatives to enter the U.S., tripling their population and adding substantial costs to taxpayers. In other words, it is an easy pathway for more immigrants to enter the U.S causing remarkably issues such as increasing the population and taxes. Not to mention that they will take up more resources and those are some issues the U.S tries to avoid.

DACA Helps Our Country!

 

Image result for daca economy
DACA actually helps

Over the years, people from all over the U.S have been on and off about the DACA program and now that Trump decided to end it led to a widespread of negative as well as positive arguments towards these young immigrants. This issue has a great impact to our society in many aspects because immigration has always been a problem. Now that this topic has been passed down to Congresses’ decision on what to do next, the real question of today is should the U.S give amnesty to DACA recipients? Of course, with such a controversial matter we have the people who defend these recipients and those who defend the state of law.

Proponents make their best argument for DACA students when they say that it helps the country’s economy.

Having these young immigrants in the United States boosts up our economy. According to Jeff Sessions announcement of revoking the program he states that DACA was denying “jobs to hundreds and thousands of Americans by allowing  those same illegal aliens to take those jobs”. In other words, companies are choosing these young immigrants instead of a U.S citizen which leads to being “unfair” however, what opponents fail to realize is that these immigrants “are productive members of society” meaning they comply with the rules a U.S citizen follows like paying taxes.

Image result for waste of money
Unnecessary

If we end up not giving amnesty and deporting all these 800,000 recipients then the decision can harm our economy. The arrangement of deporting these immigrants will be expensive for employers, because if the government does decide to not give legal authorization to the recipients then the employers are forced to fire “6,914 DACA employees at a weekly cost of $61 million” that is $63 billion per year, and that definitely decreases the economy very badly. Not to mention employers will have to waste double the money in hiring new employees and double the time to train them.

Related image
The younger the better

Most of these immigrants fall under the millennial generation because they are young and are able to benefit the country. The aging population has become a real problem due to the “fewer working-age members contributing taxes”. Particularly, since the population ages and soon retire we have less and less people working which leads to limited tax payers subsidizing to Medicare and Social Security. With the young Dreamers earning high wages they are competent enough to pay for these social cares for “decades” and can recover the money the U.S is losing due to the aging group.

Overall, those in favor of giving amnesty to DACA recipients have presented a strong argument that not only benefits the young immigrants but also the country. It is important that the government takes into consideration what is good for this society.

Amnesty For DACA Students?

Image result for daca
What Will You Do?

DACA was established in 2013 by Barack Obama and since then has had negative support as well as positive. Now that Trump has stepped into office the first thing he did was revoke it, leaving the concerns of what is going to happen next to the Dreamers.

For the next four posts, I want to explore the question of whether or not the U.S should give amnesty to DACA recipients. As we know, there has been several controversies and several reactions towards the decision of ending the program and many support this arrangement while others think it was a bad idea. I want to find out should the U.S try giving out amnesty to the Dreamers?

Reasonable people are currently debating this question now. Democrats and supporters of the DACA program are infuriated with the decision on ending DACA, Eric Schneiderman an New York attorney general sent out a protective message stating “I will go to court to protect our Dreamers”.  They have started protesting and advocating for these young immigrants. While republicans and anti-immigration people approve the idea of ending the program as it is a chance for “Congress to develop effective, compassionate policy on immigration”. Some people thought this program was unconstitutional therefore thinks it is only fair that Congress decides what to do since that is how it should have been done.

What is Wrong with Dreaming?

 

This debate has been going on for years. When Obama decided to establish this program without Congresses approval. Of course, not getting the okay from Congress, upset people and were mad about it. Throughout the years many tried to halt it but Obama protected it. Now that Trump is in office and went through with his decision, people are upset. Now they are asking what is going to happen to these young immigrants and their families? Some people say that they should be granted amnesty while others disagree, the debate is ongoing.

With such a controversial issue, we have the yes people and the no people. Supporters, like activist of pro-immigration want to try to give amnesty to DACA recipients and their parents because they believe it will help the country while opponents like anti-immigrant feel like it harms the country. Supporters not only believe it’s not the child’s fault thy were brought to the US illegally but feel like by them staying is going to help the country economically. On the other hand opponents believe that since the uprising of this program was unconstitutional then it would make it even more unlawful.

Citizens care about following rules, they want to be ensure that they are in a country in which laws are going to be followed. However, they also want to be in a country in which they show compassion and care. This situation matters because we are talking about the future of this country. We want to be able to help this country in all aspects and if this situation helps economically then why not do something about it.

 

DACA is Gone. What Now?

Image result for daca
What Are We Going To Do?

What is going to happen next? That is the question that many of us are asking after the revoking of DACA. We have split into two groups, those who agree that this was a good decision and those who think it was a bad decision. There is although another group in which sides with both. Reading the 62 comments from the article “ The DACA ‘Fix’ That Immigration Activist Fear”written by Marcela Valdes, the majority of readers have commented that they sympathize with the dreamers yet conclude that the program was unfair and needed to end.

Some commenters of this article chose not to blame the children for their parent’s actions. They believe it is not the child’s fault that he/she was brought to the United States illegally. A Monroig acknowledges that children “cannot be held responsible” and even proposes a possible solution that permits Dreamers to gain residency and maybe citizenship however cannot grant their families citizenship. This person is saying that these young immigrants should stay and be allowed to gain legal status and he compromises with people who disagree with him by suggesting that the parents should not get legal status. Another reader, Madison states “Now, Trump wants to remove this privilege from these people due to actions that are not their own” we can clearly see that she does not condemn the Dreamers rather she is infuriated with the decision and the U.S itself for allowing it. She thinks the U.S declaration of “promising life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” is a lie because if it were true then the whole diminishing of DACA would have not taken place. Laughingdragon says “I don’t resent the children born here. And not the children brought here before six” this shows that many people are misunderstood the only reason they support the decision is because they think that parents benefit from it too which is potentially false.

Image result for daca
No Deportation

Other commentators worry that now that DACA recipients are exposed so are their parents. This can lead to the deportation of not only dreamers but illegal parents causing the separation of families. Following with Lynne’s comment about Monroig and his comment, she states that “many people would be loathe to expose their parents to deportation” meaning that most dreamers would never give up their parents’ status.  Loren Bartels, a commentator claims that a Dreamer is put in a tough spot having to decide whether they want to gain some sort of residency or “protect their parents” place by “staying hidden” we can see that it is a place in which she does not want to be in and a decision she does not dare to make. She remains in hope that it does not lead to this. In another comment, Bookworm8571 argues that it is cruel “to detain or deport any member of their family”, deporting families can almost be an unhumanitarian thing to do considering the impulsive suffering these families could go through.

In another pattern, people assert that the U.S was made under laws and one should follow the orders of this country. We already know that if you come to the U.S illegally then you are breaking the law. Och Will goes into depth on the process of someone entering illegally. They are to be “detained, fined, jailed, and deported”. In other words, he wants the consequences to be enforced on immigrants and wants them to be as followed. Joe says that people who want to work in the United States should obtain a work visa and shall respect the laws. It is only fair if they come to the U.S they should at least follow rules just like everyone else. In addition, it is also important they have some sort of permit that allows them to stay either it be a visa, green card, or work permit. They must have something in order to stay, it is a law many want respected. Madison also shares with us that “protecting the country is important and laws should not go unfollowed” this is clear that people don’t think it is right for others to ignore the laws.

 

Image result for daca
We are Not Leaving Anytime Soon

Overall, reading this article and its comments I still think it is unfair to end DACA, to deport all students and their families. I understand that Obama opened up this act as an Executive action rather than an executive action like it should have been done but understand he did not do it blindly or just because he did it because he knew it was going to help the country. These Dreamers came here to be someone in life, they aspire dreams and hopes only this country could give.

 

Who Let the Critiques Out?: A Rhetorical Analysis of “Why Common Critiques of DACA Are Misleading”

Image result for daca
Don’t Shatter Dreams!

Do you ever wonder how writers become well writers? Because obviously if you are going to write for the New York Times Magazine you must be perfect or at least almost perfect! Well the author, Linda Qui is one of those perfect writers because she wrote “Why Common Critiques of DACA Are Misleading” very effectively. This article is trying to clarify the fallacious information that has been said by those who support the revoking of DACA.

Linda Qui has earned credibility on writing about this topic. She is a graduate from the University of Chicago and is a fact-check reporter who basically analyzes the actual facts instead of going with the interpretations or reactions of the topic/subject. In other words, she checks that what  people are saying is true on controversial ideas. She initially worked for the company PoliFact a fact-checking website that specifically focuses of true and false assertions. In most of her articles from PoliFact, she clarifies a misunderstood fact and gives an explanation as to why it might be true or not.  We can be assured that Qui is an excellent fit for this category because she specializes in fact-checking.

The authors structure was very well organized. She effectively uses words such as  were not, cannot, or does not to emphasize her point and connect back to her main point. For example, she writes, “DACA does not specifically grant legal permanent residency or citizenship” you can already assume that some people said that DACA does indeed provided citizenship however, Qui is clarifying that, that is not true and does so with leading evidence. Another category she uses is people and at the same time she uses repetition with titles such as DACA recipients, young immigrants, children, and undocumented immigrants. I understand why she would repeatedly use these words because her article is about the them, it is her topic and her main target. Her excessive usage of pronouns like they and them to replace DACA recipients has a great effect on her organization because in a way avoids repetition. If she were to use the same word for every sentence; DACA recipients this DACA recipients that, then that just shows she is not a skillful writer. In addition, she uses a lot of transition words like and, but, so to better refine the connections between sentences. This helps her writing because it gives logical organization.

Image result for daca
We Are United

Qui uses credible sources in her article to prove her point. Her first sources are republicans’ tweets in which a conservative and a Fox News editor both tweet about how DACA gave young immigrants a pathway to gain citizenship but some of them did not move on further with it. This shows how the conception of “DACA granting legal status” is false because republicans know it did not necessarily give them legal status rather gave a better opportunity to get citizenship compared to those immigrants who were not in the program. Yet republicans are still making false accusations that DACA does provide legal status. Qui later goes more into depth on how it did not give them citizenship and used the Homeland Security website for support. This reliable source,  owned and managed by the government itself ironically confesses that it does not give citizenship. Most of her sources are based on governmental websites and that is no debate whether her sources are reliable or not. For example, she uses the White House website “In a statement, Mr. Trump blamed DACA for the spurring the massive surge of unaccompanied minors from Central America”. Qui hyperlinks the word “statement” to show Trumps’ declaration followed by governmental statistics presenting percentages and numbers of minors coming to the U.S. Qui admits that this amnesty did aspire immigrants and was a reason as to why the numbers increased however it was not the only thing that caused them to come. In another report she uses the UN Refugee Agency to display the children’s logic to run away from their native countries and most of them were seeking safety. She also uses articles from another New York Time author. I feel like this is reliable because these authors have credentials and the magazine itself has reliable information.

The author uses techniques to help the reader understand the points effectively. She uses literary devices, more specifically uses similes and the word “than”. For example, “the unemployment rate for natives who attended college was lower than their foreigner-born peers both before and after 2012”. She uses this to compare the assumptions of American citizens and DACA recipients. This helps her claim because she is proving that these students did not take away jobs from native born Americans due to the statistic proven that it remained the same even before DACA came to place. I also believe her title was very clear on what she was going to write because it also in a way was like her main point. Not to mention that this topic is relevant to me, coming from the Latino community and having relatives and friends in this program. Her technique made it reader friendly because now it makes it clear and it is easier to understand her points.

What is DACA all about ?

daca
Dreamers are the future!

I would like to spend the rest of the semester discussing about the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Coming from a family with many in this program, I want to explore the changing face of DACA under Trump how it has opened doors to numerous opportunities and has positively impacted the Latino community.

This topic will be important to those DACA recipients as well as those who know someone in this program and of course those who support it. Most importantly I would like to address this topic to those who are against DACA and who think this program is no help. This is an important matter due to the many who wanted to end it. Not only that but this country emphasizes a lot on how essential education is. That said, why end a program in which it advocates and encourages academics to be met.

Most of us know that DACA began in 2012 under former President Obama administration. There were many opposes in Mr. Obamas decision because his action did not include Congress .   In an article written by State the Health, they inform us that DACA grants certain benefits to undocumented immigrants only if they meet with the criteria. They should have been brought to the United States before they were 16 years old and are under 33 years old. They must either be in school or have a high school diploma. Once the applicant is accepted they can acquire a Social Security number, work permit, can apply for health care, and secures their place here in the U.S. This was an unimaginable opportunity that many should have taken advantage.

When Trump came into office, he came right away targeting undocumented immigrants specifically the Latino community so there was some sort of fear of what was going to happen to these immigrants leading to an ongoing debate whether DACA should be eliminated. On Tuesday September 5, 2017 Trump decided to officially end this program causing 800,000 dreams to be broken.  With this poorly decision made, these students or as we like to call the dreamers are in risk of being deported. These Dreamers have until their expiration date on the permit or get fortunate to renew there pass for two extra years and no new applicants will be accepted. The President claims that this program was unfair to those who were born here, it supposedly takes away jobs and opportunities for them. Following up with this settlement, you can imagine how infuriated some individuals are but certainly are not going down without a fight and countless are on their side. Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s’ initiative is to sue the Trump administration because of it unconstitutional decision. Many colleges and universities are taking a stand with the Dreamers. Chancellor White, executive head of California State Universities sent out a letter stating how he disagrees with Trumps decision and even provides helpful information for Dreamers. The reason for revoking DACA was because Obama acted without Congresses approval therefore Trump decided to “fix” it by blindly diminishing DACA and leaving it up to Congress to decided what to do just how it should have been done in the first place.

I am drawn to this topic because I have family members and close friends who are currently in this program and I worry how this drastic decision can greatly affect them. They will no longer be able to keep their job, they will no longer have the right to an education and most importantly they will live with the fear that one day they will have to go back to their countries. I cannot live with the idea that all their effort and dedication put into this country is not acknowledged and going to be thrown away. They deserve to be here as much as any citizen. They have come to this country knowing it as their home and people need to understand that. I am greatly concern with what is going to happen next and want to be as much informed to be able to help my family and friends. It is also important for others to be educated about this topic simply because individuals must know their rights and make sure they do not give or receive false information from unreliable sources/people. In addition, this decision not only affects the dreamers and its family members but also comes with consequences to this country. Those who are against need to be informed that they are against it for the wrong reasons. Perhaps opinions cannot be changed but they sure need to be re-evaluated. You can agree with Trump but your explanation as to why you agree with him needs to be justified.